Data registry
A versioned source registry for the eight-county prototype: what is loaded, from whom, when, under what license, and what is still missing.
Source registry
49 verified · 14 missing or restricted
| Source | Class | Status | Retrieved | Checksum |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| County boundaries — the eight Triumph Gulf Coast counties (s. 288.8012, F.S.) U.S. Census Bureau · Generalized for display (offset 0.0005°); not for legal boundary determination. Shoreline-clipped for display, so bays read as water; legal boundaries extend offshore. Bias: not assessed | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | fccc9a3d7816… |
| Incorporated places (Pensacola, Century, Milton, Gulf Breeze, Jay) U.S. Census Bureau · Census place limits can lag recent annexations; confirm with each municipality. Shoreline-clipped, and inland bays cut out by pipeline/registry/subtract_water.py, so bays read as water; legal boundaries extend offshore. Bias: not assessed | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | 57c5c1a277b9… |
| Census tracts with ACS 2020–2024 context (eight Triumph Gulf Coast counties) U.S. Census Bureau (TIGERweb geometry; ACS via Esri Living Atlas) · Sample estimates with 90% MOE; area-level only, never individual. Shoreline-clipped for display, so bays read as water; legal boundaries extend offshore. Bias: Tract averages understate concentration within a tract (Nightingale's warning about averages). ACS margins of error are wide for small tracts. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | 6e69dd45f68b… |
| Escambia County evacuation zones Escambia County GIS · Generalized for display (maxAllowableOffset 0.0008°); not for regulatory determination. Reflects the publisher's service at retrieval time; check the publisher for adoption status and updates. Bias: not assessed | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | 1337cc7f1410… |
| Escambia County coastal high hazard area (SLOSH Cat 1) Escambia County GIS (NOAA/NHC SLOSH) · Generalized for display (maxAllowableOffset 0.0003°); not for regulatory determination. Reflects the publisher's service at retrieval time; check the publisher for adoption status and updates. Bias: The statutory area below the Category 1 SLOSH surge line is a composite envelope, so it overstates the extent any single Category 1 storm would flood. Generalized for display: edges can shift either way by roughly 30–90 m, with no net direction. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | 77231ebe66b6… |
| Escambia County water franchise areas Escambia County GIS · Generalized for display (maxAllowableOffset 0.0003°); not for regulatory determination. Reflects the publisher's service at retrieval time; check the publisher for adoption status and updates. Bias: Overstates service: a franchise area is legal authority to serve, not a connection or available capacity. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | db7a424ba3c5… |
| Escambia County Future Land Use 2030 Escambia County GIS · Generalized for display (maxAllowableOffset 0.0003°); not for regulatory determination. Reflects the publisher's service at retrieval time; check the publisher for adoption status and updates. Bias: A plan designation, not existing use; it says nothing about what is built. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | 60de5b8ad71b… |
| Escambia County special flood hazard areas (BCC adopted 2025-05-15) Escambia County GIS (FEMA DFIRM) · Generalized for display (maxAllowableOffset 0.0005°); not for regulatory determination. Reflects the publisher's service at retrieval time; check the publisher for adoption status and updates. Bias: Understates future and rainfall flooding for the same reason as the FEMA layer. Generalized for display: edges can shift either way by roughly 30–90 m, with no net direction. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | 9cf2bcfd67be… |
| Santa Rosa County evacuation zones Santa Rosa County GIS · Generalized for display (maxAllowableOffset 0.0008°); not for regulatory determination. Reflects the publisher's service at retrieval time; check the publisher for adoption status and updates. Bias: not assessed | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | ee65bdd94951… |
| Santa Rosa County storm surge zones (SLOSH, Statewide Regional Evacuation Study) Santa Rosa County GIS (FDEM / RPC study) · Generalized for display (maxAllowableOffset 0.0008°); not for regulatory determination. Reflects the publisher's service at retrieval time; check the publisher for adoption status and updates. Bias: SLOSH maximum-of-maximums envelopes overstate the extent of any single storm of that category. Generalized for display: edges can shift either way by roughly 30–90 m, with no net direction. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | 8224f353acc3… |
| Santa Rosa County future land use map Santa Rosa County Community Planning, Zoning and Development · Generalized for display (maxAllowableOffset 0.0003°); not for regulatory determination. Reflects the publisher's service at retrieval time; check the publisher for adoption status and updates. Bias: A plan designation, not existing use; it says nothing about what is built. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | 5469828b8d9a… |
| FEMA NFHL special flood hazard areas — Escambia and Santa Rosa (SFHA_TF = T) FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer · Generalized for display (maxAllowableOffset 0.0005°); not for regulatory determination. Reflects the publisher's service at retrieval time; check the publisher for adoption status and updates. Bias: Understates future and rainfall flooding: the 1% zones describe current coastal and riverine conditions and exclude sea level rise and flooding outside mapped floodplains. Generalized for display: edges can shift either way by roughly 30–90 m, with no net direction. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | f902a170ba9e… |
| Santa Rosa County SLR vulnerability assessment — prioritized critical assets (points) Santa Rosa County BOCC with UWF GeoData Center (Resilient Florida Agreement 22PLN39) · Generalized for display (maxAllowableOffset 0°); not for regulatory determination. Reflects the publisher's service at retrieval time; check the publisher for adoption status and updates. Bias: Selection: only the assets Santa Rosa County ranked are ingested, so the layer shows prioritized exposure, not the full inventory. The flood model is not documented on the service; its error direction is not assessed. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | b01172f056ba… |
| Santa Rosa County SLR vulnerability assessment — prioritized critical assets (lines) Santa Rosa County BOCC with UWF GeoData Center (Resilient Florida Agreement 22PLN39) · Generalized for display (maxAllowableOffset 0.0002°); not for regulatory determination. Reflects the publisher's service at retrieval time; check the publisher for adoption status and updates. Bias: Selection: only ranked assets are ingested. Maximum depth on a long line describes its lowest point, not the whole feature. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | 5fb03a63e818… |
| Santa Rosa County SLR vulnerability assessment — prioritized critical assets (polygons) Santa Rosa County BOCC with UWF GeoData Center (Resilient Florida Agreement 22PLN39) · Generalized for display (maxAllowableOffset 0.0003°); not for regulatory determination. Reflects the publisher's service at retrieval time; check the publisher for adoption status and updates. Bias: Selection: only ranked assets are ingested. Maximum depth on a polygon describes its lowest point, not the whole feature. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | 4587936c3f8e… |
| Escambia County vulnerability assessment — critical asset points with modeled water depths (Jacobs story map service) Escambia County (story map by Jacobs Solutions with APTIM; Resilient Florida) · Generalized for display (maxAllowableOffset 0°); not for regulatory determination. Reflects the publisher's service at retrieval time; check the publisher for adoption status and updates. Bias: Understates linear and area assets: Escambia published 140 points only, so roads, pipes and parks are missing. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | 0c57921c6735… |
| Neighbouring counties in Alabama, Georgia and Florida (map context only) U.S. Census Bureau · Drawn as land around the eight counties so the state line does not read as a coastline; generalised to about 300 m by pipeline/registry/build_neighbours.py. Not used in any calculation. Bias: not assessed | Public | verified | 2026-10-25 | d527164a5ed9… |
| Fla. Stat. §170.01 — authority to provide improvements (incl. (1)(d) utility relocation / undergrounding) The Florida Senate · Text of (1)(d) checked: undergrounding "pursuant to voluntary agreement with the utility". Site states its text is unverified for official purposes. Bias: not assessed | Public | verified | 2026-10-23 | — |
| Fla. Stat. §170.11 — improvement bonds not to exceed liens assessed The Florida Senate · Checked: bonds ≤ liens; mature ≤ 2 years after last installment; sale ≥ 95% of par; payable solely from the improvement fund. Bias: not assessed | Public | verified | 2026-10-23 | — |
| Fla. Stat. §366.96 — storm protection plan cost recovery Florida Legislature (Online Sunshine) · Checked findings and definitions (public utility excludes gas utilities). flsenate.gov 2026 page did not render without JavaScript; statute year on Online Sunshine not confirmed. Bias: not assessed | Public | verified | 2026-10-23 | — |
| Parcels — · Not loaded yet. Candidate publishers: Escambia County Property Appraiser; Santa Rosa County Property Appraiser; Florida DOR statewide cadastral. License and terms to be verified. Bias: not assessed | Public | not ingested | — | — |
| Electric, water, sewer and fiber networks — · Not shown. Provider network data may be restricted (protected critical infrastructure). Proximity is never treated as capacity. Bias: not assessed | Restricted: never sent to an AI model | restricted | — | — |
| Adopted comprehensive plans and land development codes (two counties, five municipalities) Local governments · Not yet loaded. When it is, each plan will carry its adoption date and version. Bias: not assessed | Public | not ingested | — | — |
| Utility rate schedules and tariffs Providers / Florida PSC · Not yet loaded, so Customer charges shows no existing tariff. Bias: not assessed | Public | not ingested | — | — |
| Hurricane return periods near Pensacola (NHC HURISK) NOAA National Hurricane Center · Read from the return-period maps: a hurricane within 50 nautical miles about every 10 years, a major hurricane about every 28. HURISK (1987) with data through 2010, so recent storms such as Sally (2020) are not reflected. Used only for the Gulf Breeze outage question, which stays qualitative. Bias: not assessed | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | — |
| Santa Rosa County Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment — critical assets with modeled flood depth and risk level (Resilient Florida Agreement 22PLN39) Santa Rosa County BOCC with the University of West Florida GeoData Center, in coordination with FDEP · 3,365 point, 25,577 line and 10,477 polygon assets in the four §380.093 classes, each with coastal tidal (CTF) and 100-year storm surge (SSF) depth, water elevation and risk level for current, 2040 and 2070 under NOAA intermediate-low and intermediate-high. The 2,716 assets carrying a Priority_Rank (1 Critical / Immediate … 4 Low) are ingested as three overlay files; flood-depth rasters (CTF_FD_*, SSF_FD_100YR_*) are image services not yet pulled. Report PDF not located online. Bias: not assessed | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | — |
| Escambia County Vulnerability Assessment — story map and critical asset points (Jacobs Solutions with APTIM) Escambia County Natural Resources Management; story map by Jacobs · Story map rendered: county-wide VA with SLR (2040 / 2070 intermediate-low and -high; also 2050 / 2080 fields), surge Cat 1–5, 100- and 500-year, preliminary FIRM and compound scenarios. 140 asset points with modeled water depth, risk description per scenario and a hot-spot number are published on a public feature service and ingested; no report PDF, GIS download or agreement number is linked. Lines and polygons were not published. Bias: not assessed | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | — |
| City of Pensacola Vulnerability Assessment (31 March 2024) — compliant with Resilient Florida grant requirements City of Pensacola · 279-page PDF read: NOAA 2017 intermediate-low / intermediate-high at the Pensacola gauge (8729840) for 2040, 2070 and 2100 (MHHW + SLR 3.02 / 3.68 ft NAVD88 in 2040; 3.55 / 5.52 ft in 2070); 100- and 500-year surge stillwater; 25- and 100-year rainfall; compound. Flood Risk Index weights (rain+SLR 0.35, SLR 0.25, rain+SLR+surge 0.15, exposure count 0.10, mean depth 0.10, depth percentile 0.05); ~4,500 assets in hot spots, 323 at priority 1–3. Deliverable GIS (depth-grid .tif, Prioritized Asset Inventory.gdb) described in Appendix F but not posted; request from the city. Bias: Uses NOAA 2017 curves; assessments started after 1 July 2024 must use the 2022 curves, so results are not directly comparable across jurisdictions. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | — |
| Fla. Stat. §380.093 — Resilient Florida Grant Program; vulnerability-assessment minimums The Florida Senate (2026 Florida Statutes) · Checked: four critical-asset classes; most recent public DEM; assessments initiated after 1 July 2024 use at least the 2022 NOAA intermediate-low and intermediate scenarios; two horizons from the statute table (2040 / 2070 for a 2024 assessment); surge event ≥ current 100-year; rainfall 100- and 500-year depths; GIS deliverables in Florida State Plane. Bias: not assessed | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | — |
| Resilient Cedar Key — Vulnerability Assessment (final to FDEP, 1 Sept 2024) and flood-risk viewer UF Florida Institute for Built Environment Resilience with Florida Sea Grant (City of Cedar Key, Resilient Florida grant) · Reference method outside the pilot area (Levy County). 134-page PDF read: 40 scenarios = {MHHW, 2-yr extreme water level, 100-/500-yr rainfall, 100-yr SFHA, Cat 1/3/5 surge} × {2022, 2040 IL/IH, 2070 IL/IH}, modified-bathtub exposure, first-floor-elevation-aware thresholds, seven asset classes incl. housing and local economy, four focus areas. Viewer is a Plotly Dash app over Mapbox with depth rasters as ArcGIS Online tiles (CDK_<scenario>_<year>) and a Cesium 3D tileset. Pattern adopted for Epomena's hazard view (docs/design/REFERENCE-vulnerability-viewers.md). Bias: Modified-bathtub exposure. Disconnected areas were removed for tidal and surge scenarios but not for the 100-year SFHA scenarios, where bathtub methods tend to overstate extent. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | — |
| NFIP Redacted Claims (OpenFEMA NfipClaims v3) — every flood-insurance claim in the eight Triumph Gulf Coast counties, aggregated to 2020 census tracts FEMA (OpenFEMA) · 53,480 claims (record as of 2026-09-08): Escambia 16,499, Santa Rosa 10,439, Bay 9,005, Okaloosa 8,226, Walton 3,174, Franklin 2,866, Gulf 1,717, Wakulla 1,554. FEMA's tract codes mix 2010 and 2020 vintages; 2010-only codes are split across 2020 tracts by shared land area (Census relationship file); 1,251 have no usable location. Paid amounts are nominal. Aggregated only; written to public/data/context/resilience.json by pipeline/registry/fetch_fema_resilience.py. Bias: Understates flood losses wherever take-up is low: a claim needs a policy, and only 8% to 25% of homes in the eight counties carry one, most of them inside the high-risk zone. So the record undercounts flooding outside mapped zones, which is exactly where it is least expected. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | 243b8e051a2c… |
| NFIP Multiple Loss Properties (OpenFEMA v1) — repetitive-loss and severe repetitive-loss properties FEMA (OpenFEMA) · 5,574 properties meeting the NFIP or FMA repetitive-loss definition across the eight counties; 1,130 severe repetitive-loss; 467 marked mitigated. Located to block group only; no addresses. Bias: Understates repeat flooding for the same reason as claims; a property only becomes repetitive-loss through paid insured claims. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | 243b8e051a2c… |
| NFIP Residential Penetration Rates and Community Status Book (CRS classes) — OpenFEMA v1 FEMA (OpenFEMA) · County take-up as of 2026-08-03: 30% (Wakulla) to 74% (Okaloosa) of homes in the high-risk zone insured; 8% (Escambia, Wakulla) to 25% (Franklin) of all homes. CRS classes for the 39 NFIP communities in the eight counties. Bias: not assessed | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | 243b8e051a2c… |
| FEMA National Risk Index — census tracts (December 2025) FEMA (FEMA_NationalRiskIndex, ArcGIS Online) · 248 tracts in the eight counties: composite risk, expected annual loss, social vulnerability and community resilience ratings, plus hurricane, coastal flooding, inland flooding and heat wave risk. Bias: Expected annual loss is built from historical losses and current exposure, so it understates hazards that are growing (sea level rise, heat). Ratings are percentile classes against every U.S. tract, not local thresholds. | Public | verified | 2026-10-25 | 243b8e051a2c… |
| American Social Habitat Atlas: tract environmental, housing, access and health indicators for the eight counties (41 indicators, 258 tracts) jjacquay/social-habitat (MIT), from EPA EJScreen 2024 archive, CDC PLACES, ACS, HRSA, USDA, NLCD, Landsat, FEMA and others · Copied as published from commit 4d06e42 by pipeline/registry/import_social_habitat.py, with each indicator's definition, limitations and status. File: /data/context/hia-indicators.json. Bias: Area-level values copied from another atlas's build. EJScreen-based air measures come from an archived 2024 copy that will not update; several sources were crosswalked from 2010 tracts. | Public | verified | 2026-10-25 | 25b1460b6516… |
| Revenue Estimating Conference: ad valorem impact of HJR 1-F (the 3 November 2026 property-tax amendment) by county, with 2026 county taxable values and fiscally constrained status Florida Office of Economic and Demographic Research; Florida Department of Revenue · County rows parsed from the conference package of 10 July 2026 (pages 682–686); figures cover all non-school levies in each county, not county government alone. Taxable values from the July 2026 Ad Valorem Estimating Conference. The ballot number and final ballot wording are as reported, not read from the certified ballot. Download: /data/finance/amendment-2026-hjr1f.json. Bias: The conference excluded local responses and later legislation, so it describes exposure before anyone reacts, not what will happen. County-wide totals overstate the county government's own loss. | Public | verified | 2026-10-25 | 54fb68ca7e5a… |
| County government revenues and expenditures by account code, FY2015–FY2025 — EDR tabulations of DFS Annual Financial Reports for the eight counties Florida Office of Economic and Demographic Research (from Department of Financial Services AFRs) · Governmental funds only, custodial column excluded. Operating revenue leaves out transfers in and debt proceeds. Federal, state-grant, state-shared and local-grant revenue are summed from the account codes named in the file. Account 517 debt service is near zero for four counties: a reporting artefact, not absence of debt; audited figures are in the findings file. Download: /data/finance/county-finance.json. Bias: Understates debt and enterprise activity: governmental funds only, and account 517 misses debt carried in enterprise funds or booked under other codes. Reported, not audited, figures. | Public | verified | 2026-10-25 | 293c30913c1f… |
| County government spending by function, latest fiscal year — EDR tabulations of DFS Annual Financial Reports for the eight counties Florida Office of Economic and Demographic Research (from Department of Financial Services AFRs) · Governmental funds only, transfers out excluded, court-related spending kept. Public safety, law enforcement (521), fire (522) and debt service (517) are broken out for the 10% budget exercise. Totals match operating expenditure in the county finance series. Download: /data/finance/county-spending.json. Bias: Actual spending, not adopted budgets; governmental funds only, so utilities and other enterprise funds are missing. Debt service booked outside account 517 is missed. | Public | verified | 2026-10-25 | 1952d3f73995… |
| Final-passage roll calls on CS/HJR 1-F, 2 June 2026, for the House and Senate members whose districts include any of the eight counties Florida Senate and Florida House of Representatives; districts from CS/SJR 100 (2022) · Ten members: House districts 1 to 7 and Senate districts 1 to 3. Each vote and seat read from the roll-call PDFs; each district's counties from the apportionment resolution. Party is not recorded. Download: /data/finance/hjr1f-votes.json. Bias: not assessed | Public | verified | 2026-10-30 | fbd8aa4f00d1… |
| County operating millage for FY2026-27 against each county's rolled-back rate, with the recorded final vote where found Virtuous Cycle LLC, from the eight county commissions' hearing packets, minutes, budget books and DR-420 forms · Countywide operating levy only. Bay's adopted rate was not found, so its proposed final rate is shown and labelled. Walton's rolled-back rate comes from minutes quoting the finance director, not a DR-420. Download: /data/finance/county-millage-2026.json. Bias: Read from county documents as posted; several are agenda backups rather than executed resolutions, and draft minutes can change. Votes are recorded only where the minutes give a count. | Public | verified | 2026-10-30 | 101c992c29a7… |
| Primary-source findings on county debt, Florida limits on local revenue, and one-time or outside money (RESTORE, Triumph, defence spending, FEMA public assistance) Virtuous Cycle LLC, from county audited statements, Florida Statutes and session laws, EDR, DOR, U.S. Treasury, FEMA and Triumph Gulf Coast reports · 317 findings, each marked verified (read in a primary document), inferred (reasoned from verified facts) or not_found. Compiled with AI assistance on 25 October 2026; not yet independently re-checked. Download: /data/finance/dependency-findings.json. Bias: Selection: covers what the research found, not everything that exists; a not_found entry means absence from the sources read, not absence in fact. | Public | verified | 2026-10-25 | fde1f61ae10d… |
| CDC PLACES: Local Data for Better Health — census tract and county data, 2025 release CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion · 248 tracts and all eight counties, 2023 crude prevalence with 95% confidence intervals for ten measures: coronary heart disease, COPD, asthma, diabetes, high blood pressure, mobility disability, no leisure-time physical activity, frequent mental distress, depression and lack of health insurance (18–64). File: /data/context/health.json by pipeline/registry/fetch_cdc_places.py. Bias: Model-based estimates pull each tract toward what its demographics predict, so they understate local extremes in both directions. Adults only. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | c1a57dc5f6cd… |
| Triumph Gulf Coast proposal pages — every posted pre-application, application and award, with document links Triumph Gulf Coast, Inc. · 381 numbered proposals: 87 awarded, 15 under review, 279 archived. Fields and links as posted; county corrected from the applicant where the page's field is garbled; each proposal's stage (awarded, under review, applied, found not eligible, withdrawn, pre-application only) read from its status and posted documents. File: /data/triumph/proposals.json by pipeline/triumph; map dots, one per proposal placed within its county, in proposal-points.geojson. Bias: Shows only what Triumph posts; documents it holds but has not posted (verification, waivers, clawback decisions) are missing, which flatters performance. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | 68e74d4c5699… |
| Triumph Gulf Coast executed grant award agreements, amendments and staff score sheets — terms read for all 87 awards Triumph Gulf Coast, Inc. (posted PDFs) · Performance metrics, reporting and repayment terms from 87 executed agreements and 119 amendments, and grades and stated returns from 142 score sheets. Read with AI assistance; 28 agreements are scans read by OCR. Deadlines marked passed are dates in posted documents only. Two titles corrected by hand (#49, #209), code-named company deals flagged with the company where the agreement names it, and reporting excerpts ended at a full sentence. Download: /data/triumph/awards.csv (spreadsheet, with a column guide at /data/triumph/awards-columns.csv) or /data/triumph/awards.json (full record). Bias: Grantee-reported and promised figures, not measured outcomes. Score-sheet returns count gross income, so they overstate net benefit. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | cac640362dd3… |
| Triumph Gulf Coast audited financial statements 2017–2025 and semi-annual reports (December 2025, June 2026) Triumph Gulf Coast, Inc.; Warren Averett (auditor) · Settlement received ($860M), interest, disbursements and admin costs summed across the annual statements; they reconcile to the audited December 31, 2025 net position. County minimums computed from s. 288.8013(2)(b), F.S. File: /data/triumph/summary.json. Bias: Region-wide job and income totals in the semi-annual reports have no published method; they are reported, not verified. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | a61b0fab8ce0… |
| Published storm outage and reliability reports Florida PSC / utilities · Not yet loaded; to be added where published. Bias: not assessed | Public | not ingested | — | — |
| Satellite Embedding V1 Annual (AlphaEarth Foundations) — year-over-year change surface Google and Google DeepMind via Earth Engine · 10 m, 64 bands, 2017–2024. Detects change; does not say what changed. Export planned in pipeline/earth-engine (ADR 0004); needs a Google Cloud project. Bias: not assessed | Public | not ingested | — | — |
| Dynamic World V1 — annual land-cover mode and class probabilities Google / WRI via Earth Engine · 10 m probabilistic classification, not a parcel survey. Export planned in pipeline/earth-engine. Bias: not assessed | Public | not ingested | — | — |
| Landsat 8/9 Collection 2 Level 2 — summer surface temperature USGS via Earth Engine · 30 m. Surface temperature is not air temperature or personal exposure. Export planned in pipeline/earth-engine. Bias: not assessed | Public | not ingested | — | — |
| Escambia County parcels — observed sample (1,065 parcels, three areas) with appraiser market and assessed values Escambia County GIS (gismaps.myescambia.com), Escambia_County/MapServer/0 · 164,073 parcels on the layer. Taxable value and roll year are not published there; the sample uses assessed value and flags exempt parcels. Full roll: DOR NAL files (below). Loaded via Fiscal → 'Load Escambia observed sample'. Bias: Overstates taxable value for homestead and exempt parcels because assessed value stands in for taxable value. Three chosen areas, not a random sample, so it does not represent the county. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | — |
| Florida DOR Property Tax Oversight — NAL / SDF tax roll files and parcel shapefiles (all 67 counties) Florida Department of Revenue · Authoritative source of just, assessed and taxable value per parcel (CSV, header row). The directory is a JavaScript-rendered SharePoint library; file names for Escambia (county 17) and Santa Rosa (county 57) must be read in a browser. Only the current roll is posted; prior years by request. Bias: not assessed | Public | pending | 2026-10-24 | — |
| Statewide parcels mirror (GIO_Parcels_for_OAWP, 10.81 million parcels) FDACS mirror of DOR / FGIO parcel data · Responds without a key (max 2,000 records per query) but publishes only CO_NO, PARCEL_ID, DOR_UC, PA_UC, JV/AV class fields and owner — no taxable value or acreage. FDOT's copy requires a token. Bias: Carries no taxable value or acreage, so per-acre fiscal metrics cannot be computed from it. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | — |
| Santa Rosa County ArcGIS server — FLUM, ELUM, city zoning (Milton, Gulf Breeze), 2021 flood panels, evacuation and surge zones, 2040/2070 flood-depth rasters Santa Rosa County GIS · Catalog enumerated; FLUM, evacuation and surge zones ingested (see layers above). No county parcel layer found on this server; parcels via the Property Appraiser or DOR NAL. Bias: not assessed | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | — |
| Escambia County ArcGIS server — parcels, zoning, FLU 2030, SFHA (adopted 2025-05-15), evacuation and surge zones, CHHA, water franchise areas, AICUZ Escambia County GIS · Catalog enumerated; evacuation zones, CHHA, SFHA, FLU 2030 and water franchise areas ingested. Zoning (7,800 polygons) not yet pulled. Bias: not assessed | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | — |
| ECUA residential mainland water and wastewater rates — 2026–2027 brochure Emerald Coast Utilities Authority · PDF text read: water minimum $15.86/month + $3.21 per thousand gallons; wastewater minimum $17.85 including 2,000 gallons + $9.73 per thousand. Escambia (ECUA) only; effective date not printed on the extracted lines — confirm with ECUA before use. Bias: Residential mainland schedule only; beach, commercial and wholesale customers pay other rates. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | — |
| Escambia River Electric Cooperative — residential rate schedule (PSC filing 09547-2024) Florida PSC filing by EREC · PDF text read: effective 2024-10-01, customer facilities charge $45.00/month, energy charge 10.60¢/kWh, plus power-cost adjustment. Serves parts of northern Escambia and Santa Rosa. Check for later filings. Bias: not assessed | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | — |
| FPL residential rate insert — effective January 2026 (RS-1) Florida Power & Light · PDF text read: RS-1 base charge $10.52; energy 7.865¢ (≤1,000 kWh) / 8.865¢ (>1,000); fuel 2.893 / 3.893¢; storm protection 0.995¢. Insert states the PSC-approved tariff prevails; Northwest Florida applicability to be confirmed against the tariff. Bias: A customer insert summarises the tariff; the approved tariff prevails where they differ. | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | — |
| Florida PSC annual distribution reliability reports (FPL, Gulf Power) 2025 Florida Public Service Commission · Report URLs return an HTML application shell rather than a PDF to automated requests; SAIDI/SAIFI values not yet read. Download in a browser and attach as a source revision. Bias: Utilities report indices both with and without major-event days; the adjusted series understates storm outages. Record which series is used. | Public | pending | 2026-10-24 | — |
| City of Gulf Breeze Comprehensive Plan 2035 (adopted 2022-08-01, Ord. 01-2022) and 2026 draft update City of Gulf Breeze · PDF (1.07 MB) reachable. A draft dated 2026-08-03 also exists on the city site; adoption status not confirmed. Bias: not assessed | Public | verified | 2026-10-24 | — |
| Escambia County Comprehensive Plan 2030 and Land Development Code Escambia County · Plan PDF link found in search returns HTML; FLU 2030 geometry (Feb 2025) is ingested. Official codified LDC is on Municode, which blocks automated requests (HTTP 403) — open in a browser. Bias: not assessed | Public | pending | 2026-10-24 | — |
| Santa Rosa County Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code (LDC chapters 3–4 under revision, 2025) Santa Rosa County · FLUM geometry ingested. County document centre reset the connection to automated requests; plan text to be attached from a browser session. Bias: not assessed | Public | pending | 2026-10-24 | — |
| City of Pensacola Land Development Code rewrite (announced Feb 2026) and comprehensive plan City of Pensacola · LDC rewrite in progress per city release; current adopted plan PDF not yet identified. Bias: not assessed | Public | pending | 2026-10-24 | — |
| Codified ordinances — Escambia County, Santa Rosa County, Pensacola, Milton, Gulf Breeze Municode (CivicPlus) · Municode returns HTTP 403 to automated requests; use a browser or the publisher's API terms before any crawl. Bias: not assessed | Public | pending | 2026-10-24 | — |
How a source gets here
- 1. Find the sourceBy hand; every source is listed in this registry
- 2. Download and parseA script per source, kept with the site's code
- 3. Record a checksumDone for every file; tests fail if a file changes without its record
- 4. Check places and namesPartly: tract and county codes are checked; names are not
- 5. Read documentsTriumph agreements and score sheets were read with AI assistance, 28 of them from scans by OCR
- 6. Human reviewSpot checks only, not line by line; check any figure against its PDF before citing it
- 7. Publish with citationsEvery figure on the site links to its source or is labelled an assumption
Data classes and boundaries
- Public — shared registry records
- Licensed partner — opt-in planning-firm knowledge packs, attributed and licensed
- Client-private — client projects; kept in the user’s own browser
- Restricted: never sent to an AI model — PHI, CUI, classified, protected infrastructure
Client activity is never converted into sales leads. Referral requests will be explicit opt-in only.